Is it better for Hopin to offer a wider range of event types or specialize in fewer, more polished event experiences?

Introduction

The trade-off question at hand is whether Hopin should offer a wider range of event types or specialize in fewer, more polished event experiences. This scenario involves balancing product breadth versus depth, a common challenge in the virtual events platform space. I'll analyze this trade-off by examining Hopin's current position, potential impacts on various stakeholders, and the strategic implications of each approach.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

• Context: I'm assuming Hopin is facing increased competition in the virtual events space. Could you provide more context on the current market dynamics and Hopin's position?

Why it matters: Helps understand the urgency and strategic importance of this decision. Expected answer: Hopin is a market leader but facing pressure from new entrants. Impact on approach: Would influence whether to focus on differentiation or market expansion.

• Business Context: Based on Hopin's business model, I'm thinking revenue is primarily driven by event organizer subscriptions. Is this correct, and are there any other significant revenue streams?

Why it matters: Helps prioritize which stakeholders and metrics to focus on. Expected answer: Subscription model with additional revenue from sponsorships and integrations. Impact on approach: Would affect the balance between serving existing clients vs. attracting new ones.

• User Impact: I'm assuming Hopin serves various user segments, from small businesses to large enterprises. Can you clarify the current user distribution and which segments are growing fastest?

Why it matters: Helps tailor the solution to the most impactful user segments. Expected answer: Mix of segments with enterprise showing strongest growth. Impact on approach: Would influence whether to specialize in high-end features or broaden appeal.

• Technical: Considering the platform's architecture, how modular is the current system for adding new event types or enhancing existing ones?

Why it matters: Affects the feasibility and resource requirements for either approach. Expected answer: Moderately modular with some legacy constraints. Impact on approach: Would determine the timeline and effort required for implementation.

• Resources: Given the potential scope of this decision, can you share any constraints on team capacity or budget for this initiative?

Why it matters: Helps set realistic expectations for implementation and experimentation. Expected answer: Limited additional resources available, need to prioritize. Impact on approach: Would influence the scale and pace of any changes or experiments.