how would you define the success of snyk's vulnerability scanning capabilities within snyk core?

Introduction

Defining the success of Snyk's vulnerability scanning capabilities within Snyk Core is crucial for measuring the product's effectiveness and guiding strategic decisions. To approach this product success metrics problem effectively, I'll follow a structured framework that covers core metrics, supporting indicators, and risk factors while considering all key stakeholders.

Step 1

Product Context

Snyk Core is a comprehensive security platform that helps developers find and fix vulnerabilities in their code, dependencies, and infrastructure as code. The vulnerability scanning capabilities are a fundamental feature of this product, enabling users to identify potential security risks early in the development process.

Key stakeholders include:

1. Developers: Motivated by writing secure code efficiently
2. Security teams: Focused on maintaining overall application security
3. DevOps teams: Interested in integrating security into CI/CD pipelines
4. Management: Concerned with reducing risk and compliance

User flow:

1. Code integration: Users connect their repositories or CI/CD pipelines to Snyk
2. Scan initiation: Automated or manual scans are triggered
3. Results analysis: Vulnerabilities are identified and prioritized
4. Remediation: Fixes are suggested and can be implemented directly or via pull requests

Snyk's vulnerability scanning fits into the company's broader strategy of shifting security left in the software development lifecycle. Compared to competitors like WhiteSource or Veracode, Snyk differentiates itself with developer-friendly tools and integrations.

Product Lifecycle Stage: Snyk Core is in the growth stage, with a established market presence but still expanding its feature set and user base.