Introduction
The recent 20% decline in average time spent on Edmunds's car review pages following the latest site redesign is a concerning trend that requires immediate attention. This analysis will systematically investigate potential root causes, generate data-driven hypotheses, and propose actionable solutions to address this critical issue.
This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: This could indicate whether the redesign has negatively impacted user experience. Expected answer: Yes, there has been an increase in user complaints. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus on UX improvements and user testing.
Why it matters: This helps identify if the issue affects all users or specific groups. Expected answer: The decline is more pronounced among returning users. Impact on approach: We'd investigate why returning users are spending less time and tailor solutions accordingly.
Why it matters: Content changes could explain shifts in user behavior. Expected answer: No major content changes were implemented. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus more on design and functionality issues rather than content-related factors.
Why it matters: Technical issues could be driving users away from the pages. Expected answer: There has been a slight increase in page load times. Impact on approach: We'd prioritize performance optimization in our solution strategy.
Why it matters: This helps rule out measurement errors as a cause. Expected answer: No changes in analytics tools or methods. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we can confidently focus on actual user behavior changes rather than data collection issues.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer