Introduction
Ogilvy's 30% decrease in new client acquisitions for brand strategy consulting services over the past 6 months is a critical issue that demands immediate attention. To address this problem, I'll employ a systematic approach to identify, validate, and resolve the root cause while considering both short-term and long-term implications.
I'll begin by clarifying the context, then rule out external factors before diving deep into product understanding, metric breakdown, and data analysis. This will lead to hypothesis formation, root cause analysis, and ultimately, a comprehensive resolution plan.
This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Seasonal patterns could explain the decrease and inform our solution approach. Expected answer: No significant change in seasonality. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus on internal factors or market changes.
Why it matters: Ensures we're comparing apples to apples in our analysis. Expected answer: No changes in tracking or definition. Impact on approach: If changes occurred, we'd need to adjust our baseline for comparison.
Why it matters: Helps distinguish between industry-wide trends and Ogilvy-specific issues. Expected answer: Some minor shifts, but nothing drastic. Impact on approach: Major shifts would prompt a deeper competitive analysis.
Why it matters: Internal changes could directly impact client acquisition rates. Expected answer: A few minor tweaks, but no major overhauls. Impact on approach: Significant changes would be a primary focus for our root cause analysis.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer