Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Activision

Why has Activision's Overwatch 2 seen a sudden spike in negative player feedback following the latest character balance update?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Data Analysis Problem Solving User Experience Gaming Esports Live Service Games Root Cause Analysis Player Feedback Esports Game Balance Activision
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating player feedback on Overwatch 2 character balance changes

Introduction

Overwatch 2's recent character balance update has triggered a surge in negative player feedback, presenting a critical product execution challenge. To address this issue, I'll employ a systematic approach to identify, validate, and resolve the root cause while considering both immediate and long-term implications for the game's ecosystem.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking this might be related to a specific character change. Could you provide details on which characters were adjusted in the latest update?

Why it matters: Pinpointing the affected characters helps narrow down the potential causes. Expected answer: A list of characters with significant changes. Impact on approach: Focuses investigation on specific character mechanics and player base.

  • Considering the player base, I'm curious about the distribution of negative feedback. Is it concentrated among high-ranking players or more evenly spread across skill levels?

Why it matters: Helps determine if the issue affects competitive play disproportionately. Expected answer: Breakdown of feedback by player rank or skill tier. Impact on approach: Tailors solutions to address concerns of specific player segments.

  • Given the nature of online games, I'm wondering about the volume and channels of this negative feedback. Are we seeing this primarily on social media, in-game forums, or through direct customer support?

Why it matters: Identifies the most impacted communication channels and potential echo chambers. Expected answer: Breakdown of feedback sources and volumes. Impact on approach: Guides communication strategy and prioritizes response channels.

  • Considering potential technical issues, have there been any reports of increased lag, disconnects, or other performance problems since the update?

Why it matters: Rules out technical factors that could be conflated with balance issues. Expected answer: Overview of technical performance metrics post-update. Impact on approach: Determines if technical fixes need to be part of the solution.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Jan 22, 2025