Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Remitly

What factors are contributing to the sudden 30% increase in failed transactions for Remitly's Economy transfers to the Philippines?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Problem-Solving Data Analysis Technical Understanding Fintech International Money Transfer Banking Data Analysis Fintech Root Cause Analysis Transaction Processing International Transfers
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating sudden increase in failed money transfers

Introduction

The sudden 30% increase in failed transactions for Remitly's Economy transfers to the Philippines presents a critical issue that demands immediate attention. This analysis will systematically identify, validate, and address the root cause while considering both short-term fixes and long-term strategic implications.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking this could be a recent change. When exactly did we start observing this 30% increase?

Why it matters: Pinpointing the timeframe helps narrow down potential causes. Expected answer: Within the last week or month. Impact on approach: A sudden spike suggests a specific trigger, while a gradual increase might indicate a systemic issue.

  • Considering user segments, I'm wondering if this affects all users equally. Are we seeing any patterns in terms of user demographics or transaction amounts?

Why it matters: Identifying affected segments can reveal underlying issues. Expected answer: Possibly more prevalent among certain user groups or transaction sizes. Impact on approach: Segmentation analysis would be prioritized if specific groups are more affected.

  • Given the specificity to the Philippines, I'm curious about local factors. Have there been any recent regulatory changes or banking system updates in the Philippines?

Why it matters: Local changes could explain the geographic specificity of the issue. Expected answer: Possible recent changes in Filipino banking or remittance regulations. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus on compliance and local partnership strategies.

  • Thinking about our systems, I'm concerned about recent changes. Have we deployed any updates to our transaction processing or fraud detection systems recently?

Why it matters: Internal changes could be inadvertently causing the increase in failed transactions. Expected answer: Possible recent system updates or new fraud detection rules. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd prioritize reviewing and potentially rolling back recent changes.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Jan 22, 2025