Introduction
For Rakuten's mobile service, we're facing a critical trade-off between expanding network coverage or improving data speeds in existing areas to better serve our customers. This decision will significantly impact our user experience, market position, and long-term growth strategy. I'll analyze this trade-off by examining our product ecosystem, key metrics, and potential experiments to inform our decision-making process.
I'd like to outline my approach to ensure we're aligned on the key areas we'll explore in this analysis.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Helps determine if we need to focus on user acquisition or retention. Expected answer: We're the third-largest provider with 15% market share. Impact: Lower market share might prioritize coverage expansion for user acquisition.
Why it matters: Influences whether we prioritize new user acquisition or ARPU increase. Expected answer: 80% subscription-based, 20% from value-added services. Impact: High subscription dependence might favor speed improvements for retention.
Why it matters: Helps balance the needs of different user groups. Expected answer: 70% urban, 30% rural; urban users consume 3x more data. Impact: High urban usage might prioritize speed improvements in dense areas.
Why it matters: Determines the feasibility and impact of speed improvements vs. coverage expansion. Expected answer: 5G in major cities, 4G covers 80% of the population. Impact: Limited 5G might suggest focusing on its expansion for speed improvements.
Why it matters: Indicates our current strategy and resource constraints. Expected answer: 60% expansion, 40% upgrades. Impact: Higher expansion budget might suggest continuing that focus.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer