Is it better for SweepSouth to focus on acquiring new customers or increasing retention and frequency of existing users?

Introduction

The key trade-off for SweepSouth is whether to focus on acquiring new customers or increasing retention and frequency of existing users. This decision is critical for the company's growth strategy and resource allocation. I'll analyze this trade-off by examining the current business context, user behavior, and potential impacts on key metrics. My approach will involve clarifying the situation, identifying relevant metrics, designing experiments, and providing a data-driven recommendation.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

• Based on the competitive landscape, I'm thinking SweepSouth might be facing increased pressure from new entrants. Could you share insights on our current market position and how it's evolving?

Why it matters: Helps determine if new customer acquisition is more urgent due to market dynamics. Expected answer: Moderate competition, but SweepSouth has a strong market share. Impact on approach: If competition is intensifying, it might lean towards new customer acquisition.

• Considering our revenue model, I assume we operate on a transaction-based system. What's our current split between revenue from new vs. returning customers?

Why it matters: Indicates the relative value of new vs. existing customers. Expected answer: 60% from returning customers, 40% from new customers. Impact on approach: A higher percentage from returning customers might favor retention strategies.

• Looking at user behavior, have we noticed any significant changes in booking frequency or churn rates recently?

Why it matters: Helps identify if there are immediate retention issues to address. Expected answer: Slight decrease in booking frequency over the past quarter. Impact on approach: A declining trend would emphasize the need for retention efforts.

• Regarding our technical capabilities, do we have the infrastructure in place to support personalized retention campaigns at scale?

Why it matters: Assesses our ability to execute sophisticated retention strategies. Expected answer: Basic personalization capabilities, but room for improvement. Impact on approach: Limited capabilities might favor simpler acquisition strategies in the short term.

• Considering our current team structure, how are our marketing and product teams resourced for acquisition vs. retention initiatives?

Why it matters: Determines our readiness to execute on either strategy. Expected answer: Slightly more resources allocated to acquisition currently. Impact on approach: Would influence the feasibility and timeline of implementing either strategy.