Introduction
Glean's search relevance score dropping by 15% over the past month is a critical issue that demands immediate attention. This metric is likely a key performance indicator for Glean's core search functionality, directly impacting user satisfaction and potentially affecting retention rates. I'll approach this problem systematically, starting with clarifying questions to gather context, then moving through hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minute)
Why it matters: Recent changes could directly impact search relevance. Expected answer: Yes, there was an update to improve search speed. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus on the trade-off between speed and relevance.
Why it matters: Helps identify if the issue is global or segment-specific. Expected answer: Enterprise users are more affected than individual users. Impact on approach: We'd prioritize investigating enterprise-specific search patterns and content.
Why it matters: Ensures we're comparing apples to apples in our analysis. Expected answer: No changes to the metric calculation. Impact on approach: If changed, we'd need to reassess the validity of the comparison.
Why it matters: Content changes could affect search relevance without system changes. Expected answer: There's been a 20% increase in non-textual content indexing. Impact on approach: We'd investigate how well the current algorithm handles diverse content types.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer