Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
⌘K
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

AvidXchange

How can we explain the unexpected 20% drop in user engagement with AvidXchange's vendor management portal features since the latest software update?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Data Analysis Problem Solving User Experience FinTech SaaS Accounts Payable User Engagement Root Cause Analysis B2B SaaS FinTech
Product Management RCA Question: Investigating sudden drop in B2B SaaS vendor portal engagement after update

Introduction

The unexpected 20% drop in user engagement with AvidXchange's vendor management portal features since the latest software update is a critical issue that demands immediate attention. This analysis will systematically identify, validate, and address the root cause while considering both short-term fixes and long-term strategic implications.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking the update might have introduced usability issues. Have we received any specific user feedback or complaints about the new interface?

Why it matters: User feedback can quickly pinpoint UX problems. Expected answer: Some negative feedback about navigation changes. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd prioritize UX improvements.

  • Considering potential technical issues, has there been any increase in error rates or page load times since the update?

Why it matters: Performance issues often lead to decreased engagement. Expected answer: Slight increase in load times for certain features. Impact on approach: We'd focus on optimizing those specific features.

  • Thinking about user segments, has the engagement drop been uniform across all user types, or are certain groups more affected?

Why it matters: Helps identify if the issue is universal or segment-specific. Expected answer: Larger companies showing a more significant drop. Impact on approach: We'd tailor solutions to the most affected segments.

  • Regarding the metric itself, has there been any change in how we measure or define user engagement recently?

Why it matters: Ensures we're comparing apples to apples. Expected answer: No changes to the engagement metric. Impact on approach: Confirms the issue is real, not a measurement artifact.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Mar 29, 2025