Introduction
For Alaska Airlines' loyalty program, we're facing a critical trade-off between offering more exclusive high-tier benefits or broadening lower-tier perks to increase overall member engagement. This decision will significantly impact our customer retention, acquisition, and revenue strategies. I'll analyze this trade-off by examining our product ecosystem, key metrics, and potential experiments to inform our decision.
I'll start by asking clarifying questions, then dive into a structured analysis of the trade-off, considering both short-term and long-term impacts on our business and customers.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Helps determine if we need to focus on retention or acquisition. Expected answer: Below average engagement, especially in lower tiers. Impact: Would lean towards broadening lower-tier perks to boost overall engagement.
Why it matters: Helps balance the potential revenue impact of focusing on different tiers. Expected answer: 60-70% of revenue from top 20% of members. Impact: High percentage would favor enhancing high-tier benefits.
Why it matters: Helps understand which changes would affect the most members. Expected answer: Pyramid structure with a broad base of lower-tier members. Impact: Large lower-tier base might suggest focusing on broader perks for greater impact.
Why it matters: Determines the feasibility and timeline of implementing changes. Expected answer: Moderate difficulty, requiring 3-6 months for major changes. Impact: Longer implementation time might favor simpler, broader changes.
Why it matters: Helps understand financial implications of shifting focus. Expected answer: Budget skews towards high-tier benefits. Impact: Limited budget for lower tiers might constrain options for broadening perks.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer