Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Great Learning
Product Trade-Off Medium Member-only

Should Great Learning prioritize expanding its course catalog or improving existing course quality to enhance student outcomes?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Strategic Thinking Data Analysis User-Centric Decision Making EdTech Online Learning Professional Development Product Strategy Edtech Growth User Outcomes Course Optimization
Product Management Trade-Off Question: Great Learning course catalog expansion versus quality improvement decision

Introduction

The trade-off question at hand is whether Great Learning should prioritize expanding its course catalog or improving existing course quality to enhance student outcomes. This scenario involves balancing growth through new offerings against refining current products for better results. I'll approach this analysis by examining the context, stakeholders, metrics, and potential experiments to inform a strategic recommendation.

Analysis Approach

I'd like to outline my approach to ensure we're aligned on the key areas I'll cover in my analysis.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Context: I'm assuming Great Learning is an established online education platform. Could you confirm if they primarily serve working professionals or a broader audience? This impacts our approach to course expansion vs. quality improvement.

Why it matters: Helps tailor our strategy to the core user base Expected answer: Primarily working professionals seeking career advancement Impact on approach: Would focus on high-value, career-oriented courses and outcomes

  • Business Context: Based on the current market, I'm thinking course completion rates might be a key revenue driver. How does Great Learning's revenue model work – is it based on course enrollments, completions, or a subscription model?

Why it matters: Aligns our strategy with the business model Expected answer: Revenue tied to course completions and certifications Impact on approach: Would emphasize course quality and student support to drive completions

  • User Impact: Considering the education landscape, I'm guessing student satisfaction heavily influences word-of-mouth growth. What's the current Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Great Learning's courses?

Why it matters: Indicates current student satisfaction and potential for organic growth Expected answer: Moderate NPS with room for improvement Impact on approach: Could justify focusing on quality improvements to boost satisfaction and referrals

  • Technical Feasibility: Given the potential need for new course development, I'm curious about our content creation capabilities. What's our current capacity for developing new courses versus updating existing ones?

Why it matters: Determines feasibility of rapid catalog expansion Expected answer: Limited in-house capacity, relying on partnerships for new courses Impact on approach: Might favor improving existing courses over rapid expansion

  • Resource Allocation: Thinking about the investment required, I'm wondering about our budget flexibility. Is there a predefined split between new course development and existing course improvement, or is this flexible?

Why it matters: Informs the scope of potential changes Expected answer: Flexible budget, but need strong justification for major shifts Impact on approach: Would require clear ROI projections for either strategy

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Jan 22, 2025