Introduction
ixigo started as a travel search and utility company, and its free train tools are still among its most-used features. Millions of people check PNR status (whether a waitlisted ticket has confirmed) and live running status (where their train is right now) on ixigo and ConfirmTkt, including many who bought tickets elsewhere. These pages bring huge traffic at almost no acquisition cost.
The trade-off: should ixigo add more ads and cross-sell to these free pages? More monetisation could add revenue and drive bookings of buses, hotels and flights. But these are utility pages people use at stressful moments, often on slow networks and budget phones. Too much clutter could push users to other apps. I'll structure the trade-off and end with a measurable recommendation.
Clarify the decision, identify the trade-off type, understand the product, form a hypothesis, choose metrics, design an experiment, plan the analysis, set decision rules and recommend.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
- Why it matters: Third-party ads earn cash but don't build ixigo's business; cross-sell builds bookings but earns later.
- Hypothetical answer: Both are on the table.
- Impact: We'll compare third-party ads and first-party cross-sell separately.
- Why it matters: A small extra ad slot on a huge page base can be significant.
- Hypothetical answer: They carry one ad slot; ad revenue is small compared with booking revenue.
- Impact: The upside from more ads is modest; cross-sell may matter more.
- Why it matters: Users who bought elsewhere are an acquisition opportunity.
- Hypothetical answer: About half of PNR checks are for tickets not booked on ixigo.
- Impact: Cross-sell to non-bookers could be valuable.
- Why it matters: Ads slow pages, especially on low-end phones.
- Hypothetical answer: Page speed is a known issue on 2G and 3G networks.
- Impact: Performance becomes a guardrail.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer