Introduction
As a product manager at Microsoft Teams, I'm faced with the decision to acquire a billing system rather than build one in-house. This scenario presents a critical trade-off between leveraging external expertise and maintaining full control over a core business function. I'll outline my approach to this decision, focusing on the key considerations, potential impacts, and the process for making an informed choice.
Analysis Approach
I'd like to start by outlining my approach to this trade-off analysis. I'll begin with clarifying questions, identify the type of trade-off we're dealing with, and then dive into a structured evaluation process. This will include understanding the product context, defining key metrics, designing an experiment, and ultimately providing a recommendation with next steps. Does this approach align with your expectations for our discussion?
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
To fully understand the context and implications of this decision, I'd like to ask a few key questions:
- Why it matters: This helps identify the core problem we're trying to solve and sets the criteria for success.
- Hypothetical answer: Our current system struggles with scalability and lacks features for complex enterprise billing scenarios.
- Impact: This would prioritize scalability and enterprise-grade features in our evaluation criteria.
- Why it matters: The timeline affects our ability to evaluate options thoroughly and may influence the build vs. buy decision.
- Hypothetical answer: We need the new system operational within 6 months to support a major enterprise customer rollout.
- Impact: This tight timeline would likely favor acquiring a system over building one from scratch.
- Why it matters: Budget constraints could limit our options and influence the long-term cost-benefit analysis.
- Hypothetical answer: We have $2 million allocated for initial implementation and expect ongoing costs to be under $500,000 annually.
- Impact: This budget allows for a robust solution but requires careful evaluation of long-term costs.
- Why it matters: Compliance needs could significantly narrow our options or increase complexity.
- Hypothetical answer: As we handle sensitive financial data, we need SOC 2 compliance and GDPR readiness.
- Impact: This would limit our choices to enterprise-grade solutions with strong security credentials.
- Why it matters: Ensures the decision supports long-term company goals and product vision.
- Hypothetical answer: Microsoft aims to position Teams as a comprehensive business solution, not just a communication tool.
- Impact: This would favor a flexible, feature-rich billing system that can support diverse business models.
Subscribe to access the full answer
Monthly Plan
The perfect plan for PMs who are in the final leg of their interview preparation
$99 /month
- Access to 8,000+ PM Questions
- 10 AI resume reviews credits
- Access to company guides
- Basic email support
- Access to community Q&A
Yearly Plan
The ultimate plan for aspiring PMs, SPMs and those preparing for big-tech
$99 $33 /month
- Everything in monthly plan
- Priority queue for AI resume review
- Monthly/Weekly newsletters
- Access to premium features
- Priority response to requested question