Introduction
The trade-off we're examining today is between implementing a customer-facing feature with a measurable impact on engagement versus upgrading our technical libraries to eliminate legacy bugs that don't have an immediately visible impact. This scenario highlights a common challenge in product management: balancing user-facing improvements with technical debt reduction. I'll walk you through my approach to this decision, considering various factors and potential outcomes.
Analysis Approach
I'd like to outline my approach to this trade-off analysis. I'll start by asking clarifying questions, then identify the type of trade-off we're dealing with. From there, I'll dive into product understanding, hypothesis formation, metrics identification, experiment design, data analysis planning, and finally, provide a decision framework and recommendation. Does this approach align with your expectations for our discussion?
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
To better understand the context, I'd like to ask a few key questions:
- Why it matters: This helps quantify the potential benefit of the customer-facing feature.
- Hypothetical answer: Let's say current engagement is at 30%, and the feature is projected to increase it by 5 percentage points.
- Impact: A substantial increase would strengthen the case for prioritizing the feature.
- Why it matters: This helps assess the urgency of the technical upgrade.
- Hypothetical answer: The bugs cause occasional system instability but haven't led to major outages.
- Impact: If the bugs pose significant risks, it might tip the scales towards the technical upgrade.
- Why it matters: This helps understand the opportunity cost of each choice.
- Hypothetical answer: The feature would take 2 months with a team of 5, while the upgrade would take 3 months with a team of 3.
- Impact: Resource requirements could influence prioritization, especially if one option allows for parallel work.
- Why it matters: This helps align the decision with broader company goals.
- Hypothetical answer: The company is planning a major marketing push in 6 months, focusing on user experience.
- Impact: This could favor the customer-facing feature to support the marketing initiative.
- Why it matters: This helps gauge the long-term impact of postponing the technical upgrade.
- Hypothetical answer: Technical debt is moderate, slowing down new feature development by about 20%.
- Impact: High technical debt might prioritize the upgrade to improve overall productivity.
Subscribe to access the full answer
Monthly Plan
The perfect plan for PMs who are in the final leg of their interview preparation
$99 /month
- Access to 8,000+ PM Questions
- 10 AI resume reviews credits
- Access to company guides
- Basic email support
- Access to community Q&A
Yearly Plan
The ultimate plan for aspiring PMs, SPMs and those preparing for big-tech
$99 $33 /month
- Everything in monthly plan
- Priority queue for AI resume review
- Monthly/Weekly newsletters
- Access to premium features
- Priority response to requested question