Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Kimberly-Clark

Why has Kimberly-Clark's Cottonelle toilet paper experienced a 20% increase in customer complaints related to product quality in the past 30 days?

Prepared by NextSprints

12 mins
Report an error
Problem-Solving Data Analysis Process Improvement Consumer Packaged Goods Manufacturing Retail Root Cause Analysis Consumer Goods Customer Feedback Quality Control Manufacturing
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating toilet paper quality complaints spike

Introduction

Kimberly-Clark's Cottonelle toilet paper has experienced a 20% increase in customer complaints related to product quality in the past 30 days. This sudden spike in negative feedback is concerning and requires immediate attention. I'll approach this issue systematically, focusing on identifying the root cause, validating hypotheses, and developing both short-term and long-term solutions.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking there might be a recent change in production. Has there been any modification to the manufacturing process in the last 60 days?

Why it matters: Production changes often lead to quality issues. Expected answer: Yes, a new machine was installed. Impact on approach: If yes, we'd focus on the new equipment and related processes.

  • Considering the specificity of the increase, I'm curious about the complaint tracking system. Has there been any change in how customer feedback is collected or categorized recently?

Why it matters: Changes in data collection can create false positives. Expected answer: No changes in the feedback system. Impact on approach: If no, we can trust the data and focus on product-related issues.

  • Given the magnitude of the increase, I'm wondering about the nature of the complaints. Are they clustered around specific quality attributes (e.g., softness, durability, absorbency)?

Why it matters: Helps narrow down potential causes. Expected answer: Complaints mainly about reduced softness. Impact on approach: If clustered, we'd focus on that specific attribute in our investigation.

  • Considering potential external factors, have there been any significant changes in raw material sourcing or suppliers in the past quarter?

Why it matters: Raw material changes can significantly impact product quality. Expected answer: No major changes in suppliers. Impact on approach: If yes, we'd investigate the new materials or suppliers.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Jan 22, 2025