Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
⌘K
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Workday
Product Trade-Off Hard Member-only

Is it better for Workday to focus on enhancing existing features or developing new modules to attract different market segments?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Strategic Analysis Market Assessment Product Roadmap Planning Enterprise Software Human Resources Technology Financial Management Systems Product Strategy Feature Enhancement Enterprise Software Market Expansion Workday
Product Management Trade-off Question: Workday feature enhancement versus new module development strategy

Introduction

The key trade-off for Workday is whether to focus on enhancing existing features or developing new modules to attract different market segments. This decision is critical for Workday's growth strategy and market positioning. I'll analyze this trade-off by examining the current product landscape, potential impacts, and key metrics, then design an experiment to inform our decision-making process.

Analysis Approach

I'd like to start by asking a few clarifying questions to ensure we're aligned on the context and objectives before diving into the analysis.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Context: I'm assuming Workday is facing increased competition in its core markets. Could you confirm if this is driving the consideration for new modules, or if there are other factors at play?

Why it matters: Helps understand the urgency and strategic importance of this decision. Expected answer: Increased competition and market saturation in core segments. Impact on approach: Would influence the balance between short-term enhancements and long-term expansion.

  • Business Context: Based on Workday's typical enterprise focus, I'm thinking our current revenue model is primarily subscription-based. How much of our revenue comes from existing customers versus new customer acquisition?

Why it matters: Informs the potential impact of focusing on existing features versus new modules. Expected answer: 70% from existing customers, 30% from new acquisitions. Impact on approach: Higher existing customer revenue would favor enhancing current features.

  • User Impact: I'm assuming our user base is primarily HR and finance professionals. Are we considering expanding into new functional areas with these potential new modules?

Why it matters: Affects the complexity of developing new modules and potential market fit. Expected answer: Yes, considering expansion into areas like supply chain or marketing. Impact on approach: Would require significant research and development for new domains.

  • Technical Feasibility: Given Workday's cloud-based architecture, I'm thinking developing new modules might be relatively straightforward. How integrated are our current modules, and what would be the technical challenges of adding entirely new ones?

Why it matters: Influences the resource allocation and timeline for new module development. Expected answer: Modules are tightly integrated, new ones would require significant architectural changes. Impact on approach: Might favor enhancing existing features if new module development is too complex.

  • Resource Allocation: I'm guessing we have dedicated teams for existing product maintenance and innovation. What's our current split in terms of resources allocated to these areas?

Why it matters: Indicates our current capacity for new development versus enhancement. Expected answer: 60% maintenance, 40% innovation. Impact on approach: Might need to reallocate resources or hire new talent for significant new module development.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Nov 19, 2024