Introduction
The sudden increase in dispute rates for TransUnion's Employment Screening reports this quarter is a critical issue that demands immediate attention. As we delve into this product execution problem, I'll employ a systematic approach to identify, validate, and address the root cause while considering both short-term fixes and long-term strategic implications.
This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Seasonal patterns could indicate external factors rather than internal issues. Expected answer: No significant seasonal pattern observed in previous years. Impact on approach: If seasonal, we'd focus on managing cyclical fluctuations; if not, we'd investigate recent changes.
Why it matters: The scale of the problem influences the urgency and resources needed for resolution. Expected answer: A 30-40% increase in dispute rates. Impact on approach: A larger increase might indicate a systemic issue, while a smaller one could point to isolated factors.
Why it matters: Identifying affected segments can help narrow down potential causes. Expected answer: The increase is more pronounced in certain industries or client types. Impact on approach: If localized, we'd focus on industry-specific factors; if widespread, we'd look at broader system issues.
Why it matters: Recent changes could be directly linked to the increase in disputes. Expected answer: A new automated screening algorithm was implemented last month. Impact on approach: If changes were made, we'd scrutinize their impact; if not, we'd look at external factors or gradual shifts in the system.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer