Introduction
To enhance Sunbit's credit decision engine for more accurate and faster approvals, we need to analyze the current system, identify pain points, and propose innovative solutions. I'll approach this by examining user segments, analyzing pain points, generating solutions, and prioritizing improvements. Let's dive in.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions
Why it matters: This helps us understand the scale of the problem and set appropriate goals for improvement. Expected answer: Processing around 10,000 applications daily with an average approval time of 30 minutes. Impact on approach: High volume would prioritize automation and scalability, while longer approval times might focus on process optimization.
Why it matters: This helps us gauge if we need to focus more on accuracy or speed of approvals. Expected answer: Current approval rate is 70%, slightly below the industry average of 75%. Impact on approach: If below average, we might prioritize accuracy improvements; if above, we could focus on speed.
Why it matters: This helps identify potential gaps in our data sources that could improve accuracy. Expected answer: Currently using traditional credit scores, income verification, and basic transaction history. Impact on approach: Limited data sources would suggest exploring additional data points for more comprehensive assessments.
Why it matters: This helps us identify areas where we can improve the user experience alongside the decision engine. Expected answer: Main drop-offs occur during income verification and when asked for additional documentation. Impact on approach: Would focus on streamlining these specific areas of the application process.
Now that we've gathered some crucial information, let's take a minute to organize our thoughts before moving on to user segmentation.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer