Introduction
The sudden decline in provider adoption of Cedar's pre-visit financial planning tool following a recent software update is a critical issue that demands immediate attention. This analysis will systematically identify, validate, and address the root cause while considering both short-term and long-term implications for Cedar's product ecosystem.
To tackle this problem, I'll follow a structured approach that covers issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development. My goal is to uncover the underlying reasons for the adoption decline and propose actionable steps to reverse the trend.
Framework overview
This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Understanding the update's specifics could reveal potential usability issues or unintended consequences. Expected answer: The update included UI changes and new features for streamlined workflow. Impact on approach: If the update significantly altered the user experience, we'd focus on user interface and workflow analysis.
Why it matters: This helps establish a baseline and determine if this is a new issue or an exacerbation of an existing trend. Expected answer: Adoption was steadily growing by 5% month-over-month before the update. Impact on approach: If adoption was previously growing, we'd focus on recent changes. If it was already declining, we'd need to consider broader, long-term factors.
Why it matters: This could reveal whether the issue is universal or specific to certain user segments. Expected answer: The decline is more pronounced among smaller practices and newer users. Impact on approach: If specific segments are more affected, we'd tailor our solution to address their unique needs and pain points.
Why it matters: Trust is crucial in financial tools, and any perceived unreliability could significantly impact adoption. Expected answer: There have been a few isolated reports of calculation discrepancies. Impact on approach: If reliability issues are confirmed, we'd prioritize technical fixes and communication to restore trust.
Subscribe to access the full answer
Monthly Plan
The perfect plan for PMs who are in the final leg of their interview preparation
$99.00 /month
- Access to 8,000+ PM Questions
- 10 AI resume reviews credits
- Access to company guides
- Basic email support
- Access to community Q&A
Yearly Plan
The ultimate plan for aspiring PMs, SPMs and those preparing for big-tech
- Everything in monthly plan
- Priority queue for AI resume review
- Monthly/Weekly newsletters
- Access to premium features
- Priority response to requested question