Introduction
To improve Klook's customer review system for more actionable insights, we need to consider both travelers and activity providers. I'll outline a strategic approach to enhance this crucial feature, focusing on user experience, data quality, and business impact.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (5 mins)
Why it matters: Determines the scope and complexity of the review system improvements. Expected answer: Millions of reviews across diverse categories like tours, attractions, and local experiences. Impact on approach: Would influence the need for category-specific review features and scalability considerations.
Why it matters: Helps identify if the primary challenge is review quantity or quality. Expected answer: 30% review rate with an average of 2-3 sentences per review. Impact on approach: Low rates would focus on increasing submission, while low quality would prioritize improving review content.
Why it matters: Ensures we address both sides of the marketplace effectively. Expected answer: Basic rating aggregation for providers, with limited insights into customer preferences or improvement areas. Impact on approach: Would guide the development of more sophisticated analytics and reporting tools for providers.
Why it matters: Identifies opportunities for differentiation and industry best practices. Expected answer: Similar basic functionality, with room for innovation in personalization and insights. Impact on approach: Would inspire features that could set Klook apart in the market.
At this point, you can ask interviewer to take a 1-minute break to organize your thoughts before diving into the next step.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer