Should Interos prioritize expanding its supplier risk database coverage or improving the accuracy of existing risk assessments in its Resilience platform?

Introduction

The trade-off question at hand is whether Interos should prioritize expanding its supplier risk database coverage or improving the accuracy of existing risk assessments in its Resilience platform. This scenario involves balancing the breadth of data against the depth and precision of risk analysis. I'll approach this by examining the current product state, potential impacts, and strategic considerations to arrive at a data-driven recommendation.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

• Based on Interos' market position, I'm thinking database coverage might be a key differentiator. Could you share how our current coverage compares to competitors?

Why it matters: Helps assess the urgency of expansion vs. improvement Expected answer: We're on par or slightly behind in certain industries Impact on approach: If behind, might lean towards expansion; if ahead, focus on accuracy

• Considering user feedback, I'm assuming accuracy is a pain point. What's the most common feedback we receive about our risk assessments?

Why it matters: Identifies the most pressing user needs Expected answer: Users find some assessments too generic or outdated Impact on approach: If accuracy is a major concern, it might take priority

• Looking at our tech stack, I'm curious about the scalability of our current system. How easily can we expand our database without compromising performance?

Why it matters: Determines the feasibility of rapid expansion Expected answer: Current architecture can handle 2x growth without major changes Impact on approach: If scalable, expansion becomes more attractive

• Regarding our team structure, I'm wondering about our current expertise distribution. Do we have more resources in data acquisition or risk modeling?

Why it matters: Helps align the strategy with our current capabilities Expected answer: Stronger in data acquisition, building risk modeling team Impact on approach: Might influence short-term focus while building long-term capabilities

• Considering our product roadmap, I'm curious about any upcoming features that might impact this decision. Are there any major releases planned that relate to either database coverage or risk assessment accuracy?

Why it matters: Ensures alignment with broader product strategy Expected answer: New AI-driven risk assessment feature in Q4 Impact on approach: Could influence timing and priority of accuracy improvements