Introduction
I would first update the company context. Omnicom completed its acquisition of Interpublic on November 26, 2025. On January 7, 2026, it announced the new Omni, integrating Acxiom, Interact, Flywheel Commerce Cloud, and Omni's expanded agentic AI framework into one operating system. “IPG creative services” and Interact are therefore legacy case context; the current frame is Omnicom's Connected Capabilities operating through Omni. (Omnicom acquisition completion; new Omni announcement)
For the scenario, I will assume a client uses legacy-IPG creative, media, data, and production capabilities and needs the work to fit its strategy, systems, approvals, and measurement plan. Before proposing another integration product, I would test the problem against Omni's existing unified workflow and confirm the exact agencies, configuration, client tools, and gaps.
The desired outcome is not simply “faster creative.” It is a shorter, more reliable path from business strategy to approved, channel-ready work and measurable learning—without weakening brand quality, accessibility, rights management, privacy, or human accountability.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions
Why it matters: the operating model determines where ownership and handoffs break down.
Why it matters: building a new platform is wasteful if the problem is an unclear decision right or inconsistent process.
Why it matters: a proposal should connect to the client's source systems instead of creating another source of truth.
Why it matters: speed and creative effectiveness can conflict.
Why it matters: these are product requirements, not post-launch checks.
Do not invent client complaints or IPG capabilities. Label pain points as hypotheses, ask for artifacts and workflow evidence, and explain how the answer changes the design.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer