Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Checkr

Why has Checkr's Basic Background Check product seen a 15% drop in completion rates over the past month?

Prepared by NextSprints

12 mins
Report an error
Data Analysis Problem Solving Technical Understanding HR Tech SaaS Compliance User Experience Performance Optimization Root Cause Analysis Data Processing Background Checks
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating Checkr's background check completion rate decline

Introduction

Checkr's Basic Background Check product has experienced a 15% drop in completion rates over the past month, signaling a critical issue that requires immediate attention. This analysis will systematically identify, validate, and address the root cause while considering both short-term fixes and long-term strategic implications.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking there might be a recent change. Has there been any product update or system modification in the last 1-2 months?

Why it matters: Recent changes often correlate with performance shifts. Expected answer: Yes, there was a UI update or backend change. Impact on approach: If yes, we'd focus on change-related issues; if no, we'd look at external factors or gradual trends.

  • Considering user segments, I'm curious about the distribution. Is the 15% drop uniform across all user types, or is it concentrated in specific segments?

Why it matters: Helps identify if the issue is global or segment-specific. Expected answer: The drop is more pronounced in certain user segments. Impact on approach: Segment-specific issues would lead to targeted solutions, while uniform drops suggest systemic problems.

  • Regarding the completion rate metric, I'm wondering about its components. Has the definition or measurement of "completion" changed recently?

Why it matters: Ensures we're comparing apples to apples in our analysis. Expected answer: No changes to the metric definition. Impact on approach: If changed, we'd need to reassess the validity of the comparison; if not, we can focus on actual performance issues.

  • Thinking about external factors, have there been any significant industry events or regulatory changes in the background check space recently?

Why it matters: External factors can significantly impact product performance. Expected answer: No major industry shifts. Impact on approach: If yes, we'd need to consider adapting our product to new market conditions; if no, we'd focus more on internal factors.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Jan 22, 2025