Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Harvey
Product Success Metrics Medium Member-only

How would you measure the success of Harvey Workflows?

Prepared by NextSprints

14 mins
Report an error
Metric Definition North Star Design Quality Measurement Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Success-Metrics North-Star-Metric Legal-Tech Workflows
Product Management Product Success Metrics Question: measuring success of Harvey Workflows

Introduction

Harvey Workflows are pre-built and custom multi-step processes for legal work. Instead of writing a prompt from scratch, a lawyer picks a workflow such as "Draft a client alert," "Review a lease against a checklist" or "Prepare a deposition outline," uploads the inputs, and Harvey runs a series of steps designed by legal experts. Firms and legal departments can also build their own workflows with Harvey's Workflow Builder, packaging their know-how so any lawyer can use it. Harvey has reported that customers have built tens of thousands of custom workflows and agents on its platform.

The prompt asks how we would measure the success of Harvey Workflows. Workflows sit between chat (Assistant) and fully autonomous agents, so success must capture both how often lawyers use them and whether they produce work lawyers trust.

Framework Overview

I'll cover product context, goals, a North Star metric and its breakdown, supporting, guardrail, trade-off and counter metrics, and initiatives to move the numbers.

Step 1

Product Context (3 minutes)

Key stakeholders:

  • Lawyers (associates, in-house counsel): want reliable outputs faster than doing the work by hand.
  • Knowledge management and innovation teams: build custom workflows that capture firm expertise.
  • Firm leadership and general counsels: want a return on Harvey licences and consistent quality.
  • Harvey: wants daily usage, seat expansion and differentiation from general AI assistants.

User flow:

  1. Lawyer opens Harvey and browses or searches the workflow library.
  2. Selects a workflow and provides inputs (documents, instructions).
  3. Harvey runs the steps, sometimes asking for confirmation between steps.
  4. Lawyer reviews the output, edits it, and exports to Word or saves to Vault.
  5. Knowledge teams monitor which workflows are used and refine them.

Product lifecycle stage: Growth. Workflows are well established, and custom workflow creation is expanding quickly as customers encode their own processes.

Competitive context: Thomson Reuters CoCounsel skills, Legora and other legal AI platforms, plus generic tools such as Microsoft Copilot. Harvey's advantages are legal-specific workflows, a builder that firms use to encode their own methods, and integration with Vault and Knowledge sources.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Oct 31, 2026