Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Harvey
Product Improvement Medium Member-only

How would you improve Harvey's Microsoft Word add-in for lawyers drafting and negotiating contracts?

Prepared by NextSprints

14 mins
Report an error
User Journey Mapping Prioritization Habit Formation Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Productivity Software Product-Improvement Legal-Tech Microsoft-Word Contracts
Product Management Product Improvement Question: Harvey Word add-in for contract drafting and negotiation

Introduction

Lawyers live in Microsoft Word. Contracts, briefs, memos and redlines are drafted, negotiated and finalised there, often with tracked changes flowing between firms. Harvey offers an add-in for Word that brings Harvey Assistant into the document, so lawyers can ask questions about a draft, generate or revise clauses, and propose redlines without leaving the file. Harvey has also expanded its Microsoft 365 integrations in 2026.

The prompt asks how we would improve Harvey's Word add-in for lawyers drafting and negotiating contracts. I'll clarify the context, segment users, map the drafting journey, identify pain points, generate and prioritise solutions, and define metrics.

Tip

Improvement questions reward specificity. Name the exact moment in a lawyer's workflow where the product fails, rather than proposing generic "AI features."

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (5 mins)

  • Looking at usage, how does add-in activity compare with the Harvey web app?

Why it matters: Shows whether the add-in is underused or simply used differently. Expected answer: About 30% of Harvey users have installed the add-in, but only a third of those use it weekly, while the web app is used daily. Impact on approach: Focus on what stops installed users from making it a habit.

  • Which users and document types are we prioritising?

Why it matters: Litigation briefs and transactional contracts are drafted differently. Expected answer: Transactional lawyers at large firms and in-house teams working on commercial contracts. Impact on approach: Design around redlining, clause drafting and negotiation.

  • Are there technical constraints?

Why it matters: Word add-ins have limited screen space and access to document structure. Expected answer: The add-in runs in a side panel and can read and edit the document, including tracked changes. Impact on approach: Solutions must work in a narrow panel and respect tracked changes.

  • What is the business goal?

Why it matters: Aligns the improvement. Expected answer: Increase daily active usage and seat expansion at renewal by making Harvey part of every drafting session. Impact on approach: Measure weekly active add-in users and tasks completed in Word.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Oct 31, 2026