Introduction
Wealth management clients of UBS can check their portfolios in the UBS app and e-banking. A question product teams face: should the app show intraday portfolio values that move with live market prices, or keep end-of-day valuations? Intraday values feel modern and match what Yuh, Swissquote, Revolut and US brokers show. But UBS's wealth clients often hold discretionary mandates, funds, structured products and private market investments that don't price intraday, and constant price movement can trigger anxiety and calls to advisors. This trade-off tests whether a candidate can balance engagement, client outcomes, cost and accuracy.
I'll clarify, identify the trade-off type, understand the product, form a hypothesis, choose metrics, design an experiment, plan analysis, set decision rules and recommend next steps.
Step 1
Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)
Why it matters: Self-directed traders and discretionary mandate clients want different things. Expected answer: Swiss wealth management clients with both advisory and discretionary mandates. Impact on approach: We may need different defaults per mandate type.
Expected answer: Client feedback says the app feels outdated compared with neobrokers; some advisors worry intraday values will increase panic calls. Impact on approach: We weigh perceived modernity against advisor workload and client behaviour.
Expected answer: Around 60% for a typical client; the rest are funds with daily NAVs, structured products and alternatives. Impact on approach: An "intraday" total could be misleading.
Expected answer: Exchange data licences for display to many clients are significant, and peak-load infrastructure is needed.
Expected answer: Yes, the same team owns post-migration improvements.
Practice similar questions
Subscribe to access the full answer