Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
⌘K
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Doctolib

Why has the average time spent by doctors using Doctolib's practice management software increased by 25% this quarter?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Data Analysis Problem Solving User Experience Design Healthcare SaaS Practice Management Product Metrics Root Cause Analysis User Behavior Healthcare Tech UI/UX
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating increased usage time in healthcare software

Introduction

The recent 25% increase in average time spent by doctors using Doctolib's practice management software is a significant shift that warrants thorough investigation. This analysis will systematically explore potential root causes, generate data-driven hypotheses, and propose actionable solutions to address this unexpected change in user behavior.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking there might be seasonal factors at play. Has this increase coincided with any particular time of year or event in the medical calendar?

Why it matters: Seasonal patterns could explain temporary changes in usage. Expected answer: No significant seasonal correlation identified. Impact on approach: If seasonal, we'd focus on cyclical adaptations; if not, we'd investigate more systemic issues.

  • Considering user segments, I'm curious about the distribution of this increase. Is the 25% increase uniform across all doctor specialties and practice sizes?

Why it matters: Uneven distribution could point to specific user group challenges. Expected answer: Increase varies across specialties, with general practitioners showing the highest uptick. Impact on approach: We'd tailor our investigation and solutions to the most affected user segments.

  • Thinking about recent changes, have there been any significant updates to the software or new features rolled out in the past quarter?

Why it matters: New features or updates could be causing unexpected user behavior. Expected answer: A major UI overhaul was implemented two months ago. Impact on approach: We'd focus on usability issues and user adaptation to the new interface.

  • Regarding data integrity, has there been any change in how we measure or define "time spent" on the platform?

Why it matters: Ensures we're comparing apples to apples in our metrics. Expected answer: No changes to measurement methodology. Impact on approach: Confirms the increase is real and not a result of altered metrics.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Nov 28, 2024