Student pricing is available for eligible university email holders. View plans

NextSprints
NextSprints Icon NextSprints Logo
⌘K
Product Design

Master the art of designing products

Product Improvement

Identify scope for excellence

Product Success Metrics

Learn how to define success of product

Product Root Cause Analysis

Ace root cause problem solving

Product Trade-Off

Navigate trade-offs decisions like a pro

All Questions

Explore all questions

Meta (Facebook) PM Interview Course

Practice Meta-focused PM cases

Amazon PM Interview Course

Practice Amazon-focused PM cases

Apple PM Interview Course

Practice Apple-focused PM cases

Google PM Interview Course

Practice Google-focused PM cases

Microsoft PM Interview Course

Practice Microsoft-focused PM cases

All Courses

Explore all courses

1:1 PM Coaching

Practice in a one-to-one session

Resume Review

Narrate impactful stories via resume

Guides Pricing
nextsprints logo

Not a member?

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement.

nextsprints logo

Register to continue.

Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and confirm you have read our Privacy and Cookie Statement .

Company focus

Workday

Why has the adoption rate of Workday's new expense reporting module dropped by 30% over the last quarter?

Prepared by NextSprints

15 mins
Report an error
Data Analysis Problem Solving User Experience Enterprise Software Human Resources Financial Technology Root Cause Analysis Enterprise Software SaaS User Adoption Workday
Product Management Root Cause Analysis Question: Investigating Workday's expense module adoption rate decline

Introduction

The recent 30% drop in adoption of Workday's new expense reporting module over the last quarter is a concerning trend that requires immediate attention. To address this issue, I'll employ a systematic approach to identify, validate, and resolve the root cause while considering both short-term fixes and long-term strategic implications.

Framework overview

This analysis follows a structured approach covering issue identification, hypothesis generation, validation, and solution development.

Step 1

Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)

  • Looking at the timing, I'm thinking there might have been a recent update. Has there been any significant change to the expense reporting module in the last 3-4 months?

Why it matters: Recent changes could directly impact user adoption. Expected answer: Yes, there was a major UI overhaul. Impact on approach: If confirmed, we'd focus on UI/UX issues and change management.

  • Considering user segments, I'm curious about the adoption patterns. Are we seeing a uniform 30% drop across all user types, or is it more pronounced in certain groups?

Why it matters: Helps identify if the issue is universal or specific to certain users. Expected answer: The drop is more significant among occasional users. Impact on approach: We'd investigate features that might be challenging for less frequent users.

  • Thinking about the broader ecosystem, has there been any change in company expense policies or integrations with other financial systems?

Why it matters: External factors could be influencing user behavior. Expected answer: No major policy changes, but there's been some API integration issues. Impact on approach: We'd need to investigate the technical aspects of system integrations.

  • Considering performance metrics, I'm wondering about the system's reliability. Have there been any reported increases in errors or system downtime?

Why it matters: Technical issues could be deterring users from adopting the new module. Expected answer: There's been a slight increase in error rates during peak usage times. Impact on approach: We'd prioritize investigating and resolving performance bottlenecks.

Subscribe to access the full answer

Image of author NextSprints

NextSprints

Updated Dec 1, 2024